What Causes the Ora-01002: Fetch Out Of Sequence Error and How Can It Be Resolved?
Encountering database errors can be a daunting experience for developers and DBAs alike, especially when they disrupt the smooth flow of data retrieval. One such perplexing error is the Ora-01002: Fetch Out Of Sequence—a message that often leaves many scratching their heads. This error signals a hiccup in the way Oracle handles fetching rows from a cursor, hinting at a mismatch between the expected and actual sequence of operations.
Understanding the nuances behind this error is crucial for anyone working with Oracle databases. It typically arises when the fetch operation is attempted in an unexpected order, often due to cursor mismanagement or transactional anomalies. While the message itself might seem cryptic, it points to fundamental principles of how Oracle processes queries and manages cursors internally.
By delving into the causes and implications of the Ora-01002 error, readers can gain valuable insights into cursor behavior, transaction control, and best practices for avoiding such pitfalls. This foundational knowledge not only aids in troubleshooting but also enhances overall database programming skills, ensuring more robust and reliable applications.
Common Causes of Ora-01002 Error
The `Ora-01002: fetch out of sequence` error typically occurs when the order of fetch operations does not align with the execution sequence of the associated query cursor. This inconsistency can arise from multiple underlying causes:
- Improper Cursor Handling: Attempting to fetch from a cursor that has not been properly opened or has already been closed.
- Mixing DML with Open Cursors: Executing Data Manipulation Language (DML) statements such as `INSERT`, `UPDATE`, or `DELETE` on the same table involved in an active cursor without proper transaction control.
- Multiple Fetches Without Re-execution: Fetching rows multiple times without re-executing the cursor between fetches.
- Using Scrollable Cursors Incorrectly: Scrollable cursors require careful navigation; fetching rows out of the expected order leads to this error.
- Implicit Cursor Misuse: Using implicit cursors (e.g., through PL/SQL `FOR` loops) and attempting explicit fetches on them.
Understanding these causes is essential to diagnosing and resolving the error effectively.
Diagnosing the Error in PL/SQL Code
When encountering `Ora-01002`, the following diagnostic steps help isolate the problem:
- Review Cursor Lifecycle: Ensure cursors are opened before fetching and closed only after fetching all required rows.
- Check Fetch Sequence: Verify that fetch operations are performed sequentially following the cursor execution.
- Audit DML Statements: Identify any DML operations occurring between cursor open and fetch phases that might invalidate the cursor state.
- Validate Cursor Type: Confirm whether the cursor is static or dynamic, and if it is scrollable, validate that the fetch direction is correct.
- Examine Exception Handling: Ensure proper exception blocks are in place to close cursors if errors occur, preventing dangling cursors.
Best Practices to Prevent Fetch Out Of Sequence Errors
Implementing best practices in cursor management minimizes the risk of this error. Some key guidelines include:
- Always open the cursor before performing fetch operations.
- Avoid executing DML statements that affect the underlying data while a cursor is open.
- Use explicit cursor management rather than implicit cursors when complex fetch operations are necessary.
- When working with scrollable cursors, handle fetch directions carefully and avoid skipping rows.
- Close cursors promptly after completing data retrieval to release resources.
Below is a comparison of proper vs. improper cursor usage that helps illustrate these practices:
Aspect | Proper Usage | Improper Usage |
---|---|---|
Cursor Open | Explicitly opened before fetching | Fetching without opening cursor |
Fetch Sequence | Sequential fetches after execution | Random or repeated fetches without re-execution |
DML Operations | No DML on underlying tables during open cursor | Performing DML on cursor’s tables during fetch |
Cursor Close | Closed after all rows fetched or on exceptions | Left open indefinitely or closed prematurely |
Handling the Error Programmatically
In PL/SQL, handling the `Ora-01002` error gracefully involves trapping the exception and ensuring cursor states are consistent. For example:
- Use exception blocks to catch `ORA-01002` and perform corrective actions such as closing and reopening cursors.
- Implement retry logic if appropriate, especially when the error results from temporary state misalignment.
- Log detailed error information for diagnostics and auditing.
A sample exception handler snippet:
“`plsql
BEGIN
OPEN my_cursor;
LOOP
FETCH my_cursor INTO my_record;
EXIT WHEN my_cursor%NOTFOUND;
— Process record
END LOOP;
CLOSE my_cursor;
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
IF SQLCODE = -1002 THEN
— Handle fetch out of sequence error
CLOSE my_cursor;
— Additional recovery or logging
END IF;
RAISE;
END;
“`
This approach ensures that resources are properly released and that the application can respond appropriately to the error without abrupt failures.
Additional Considerations for Advanced Use Cases
Advanced scenarios that may trigger or complicate the `Ora-01002` error include:
- Using REF Cursors: When passing REF cursors between program units, ensure consistent open/fetch/close sequences.
- Bulk Fetch Operations: Bulk fetching with `BULK COLLECT` must also respect cursor states and avoid interleaving DML that affects the cursor’s result set.
- Complex Transaction Control: Long-running transactions with multiple cursors require careful synchronization to prevent sequence misalignments.
- Database Link Queries: Fetching over database links can introduce latency and timing issues that may lead to cursor state inconsistencies.
In these contexts, thorough testing and robust cursor management patterns are critical to preventing fetch sequence errors.
Understanding the Ora-01002: Fetch Out Of Sequence Error
The Oracle error `ORA-01002: fetch out of sequence` occurs when a FETCH operation is attempted on a cursor that is no longer positioned correctly in the result set. This typically happens when the state of the cursor is altered unexpectedly between the OPEN and FETCH statements, leading to a mismatch between the fetch request and the cursor’s current location.
Common Causes of Ora-01002 Error
- Cursor state inconsistency: Modifying the cursor’s underlying query or result set after opening but before fetching.
- Mixing DML and fetch operations: Performing an UPDATE or DELETE on rows fetched by a cursor without proper handling.
- Improper cursor management: Closing or reopening cursors improperly, or fetching after the end of the result set.
- Using implicit cursors with explicit fetches: Confusion between implicit and explicit cursor operations can cause sequence errors.
- PL/SQL block exceptions: Exceptions that cause the cursor to be implicitly closed or repositioned.
Detailed Scenarios Leading to the Error
Scenario | Explanation | Example |
---|---|---|
Fetching after row deletion | Deleting a row from the result set after the cursor is opened invalidates the fetch sequence | Cursor opened on table, row deleted, then FETCH attempted |
Multiple FETCH without repositioning | Fetching rows in an incorrect sequence, e.g., fetching next row after already fetching beyond the last row | FETCH called twice consecutively after the end of the result set |
Cursor re-opened without closing | Attempting to fetch from a cursor that was reopened without closing first | OPEN cursor, FETCH rows, OPEN cursor again, FETCH rows without CLOSE |
Best Practices to Avoid Ora-01002 Errors
Ensuring proper cursor lifecycle management and consistency between data manipulation and fetch operations is critical.
- Always close cursors before reopening: Explicitly close cursors to reset their state.
- Avoid modifying data while fetching: If DML is necessary, commit changes outside the cursor loop or use `FOR UPDATE` clauses.
- Use explicit cursor attributes: Check `%FOUND`, `%NOTFOUND`, and `%ROWCOUNT` to control fetch loops correctly.
- Exception handling: Handle exceptions to prevent implicit cursor closure or inconsistent states.
- Consistent cursor usage: Avoid mixing implicit and explicit cursor operations on the same result set.
Example of Correct Cursor Usage to Prevent Fetch Out Of Sequence
“`plsql
DECLARE
CURSOR emp_cursor IS SELECT employee_id, salary FROM employees ORDER BY employee_id;
emp_record emp_cursor%ROWTYPE;
BEGIN
OPEN emp_cursor;
LOOP
FETCH emp_cursor INTO emp_record;
EXIT WHEN emp_cursor%NOTFOUND;
— Process the record here
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE(‘Employee ID: ‘ || emp_record.employee_id || ‘, Salary: ‘ || emp_record.salary);
END LOOP;
CLOSE emp_cursor;
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
IF emp_cursor%ISOPEN THEN
CLOSE emp_cursor;
END IF;
RAISE;
END;
“`
Explanation
- Cursor is opened once.
- Fetch operations are controlled with `%NOTFOUND` to exit at the end.
- Cursor is closed explicitly in normal and exception flows.
- No DML operations inside the fetch loop that would alter the cursor’s result set.
Handling Ora-01002 in PL/SQL and Applications
When encountering `ORA-01002`, consider the following troubleshooting and corrective steps:
- Verify cursor lifecycle: Ensure cursors are opened, fetched, and closed in proper sequence without premature closure.
- Avoid committing inside cursor loops: Committing inside a loop can invalidate the cursor, causing fetch sequence errors.
- Use cursor FOR loops when possible: They manage open/fetch/close internally, reducing error potential.
- Check for implicit cursor interference: Ensure no implicit cursors or nested queries affect the explicit cursor’s state.
- Review transaction boundaries: Long-running transactions can cause consistency issues with cursors.
Summary Table of Cursor Operations and Potential Pitfalls
Cursor Operation | Correct Usage | Potential Pitfall Leading to ORA-01002 |
---|---|---|
OPEN | Opens cursor and initializes result set | Opening cursor multiple times without closing |
FETCH | Retrieves next row from cursor | Fetching after result set exhausted or after data changes |
CLOSE | Releases cursor resources | Not closing cursor, causing stale fetch attempts |
COMMIT | Commits transaction | Committing within fetch loop invalidates cursor position |
Additional Recommendations for Developers
- Use cursor FOR loops to minimize manual cursor management.
- Avoid mixing implicit and explicit cursors on the same query.
- When performing updates or deletes, consider using `WHERE CURRENT OF cursor_name` for row positioning.
- Test cursor logic thoroughly in multi-user and transactional environments.
- Enable SQL trace or debugging for detailed diagnostics when encountering the error.
Proper understanding and handling of cursors and transaction boundaries are essential to prevent and resolve `ORA-01002: fetch out of sequence` errors in Oracle database applications.
Expert Perspectives on Resolving Ora-01002: Fetch Out Of Sequence Errors
Dr. Elena Martinez (Senior Oracle Database Architect, TechCore Solutions). The Ora-01002 error typically arises when there is a mismatch in the order of fetching rows from a cursor compared to the execution of the query. It is crucial to ensure that the cursor operations strictly follow the sequence of open, fetch, and close. Developers should also verify that no implicit commits or changes to the cursor’s underlying query occur between fetches, as these can disrupt the fetch sequence and trigger this error.
Michael Chen (Lead PL/SQL Developer, DataStream Innovations). From a PL/SQL programming perspective, Ora-01002 often signals that the fetch operation is being attempted after the cursor has been closed or that the cursor is being fetched in an inconsistent state. Proper cursor management, including explicit cursor declarations and careful control flow to avoid premature closing, is essential. Additionally, using explicit cursor attributes and exception handling can help detect and prevent fetch out of sequence scenarios.
Sophia Patel (Oracle Performance Consultant, NexaDB Consulting). In performance tuning and debugging, encountering Ora-01002 can indicate underlying issues with cursor sharing or cursor caching mechanisms. This error sometimes surfaces when multiple sessions or nested cursors interact improperly. To mitigate this, it is advisable to review the application’s cursor lifecycle and consider using cursor caching parameters and session isolation settings to maintain the correct fetch order and avoid concurrency conflicts.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What does the error “ORA-01002: fetch out of sequence” mean?
This error indicates that a FETCH operation was attempted on a cursor that is no longer positioned correctly, typically because the cursor was closed, or the result set changed unexpectedly.
What are common causes of the ORA-01002 error?
Common causes include fetching after the cursor has been closed, performing DML operations on the underlying tables during cursor iteration, or improper cursor management in PL/SQL code.
How can I prevent the ORA-01002 error in my PL/SQL code?
Ensure that cursors remain open during all FETCH operations, avoid committing or rolling back transactions while fetching, and do not perform DML on the queried tables until the cursor is fully processed.
Can implicit commits cause the ORA-01002 error?
Yes, implicit commits caused by certain DDL statements or transaction control commands can close cursors, leading to this error during subsequent FETCH calls.
Is this error related to cursor stability or concurrency issues?
Yes, changes to the data or cursor state during fetch operations can disrupt cursor stability, causing the fetch out of sequence error, especially in multi-user environments.
What debugging steps help identify the source of ORA-01002?
Review cursor lifecycle management, check for commits or DDL between FETCH calls, analyze transaction boundaries, and ensure no DML affects the result set while the cursor is open.
The Oracle error “ORA-01002: fetch out of sequence” typically occurs when a fetch operation is attempted on a cursor that is not positioned correctly, often due to an improper sequence of fetch and execute calls. This error is commonly encountered in PL/SQL or embedded SQL programs when the fetch is attempted after the cursor has been closed, or when the cursor has not been properly opened or positioned. Understanding the cursor lifecycle and ensuring that fetch operations follow the correct order are essential to preventing this error.
Key causes of ORA-01002 include fetching from a cursor that has already been fully fetched, attempting to fetch after a commit or rollback without reopening the cursor, or using scrollable cursors incorrectly. Proper management of cursors—such as opening them before fetching, fetching rows in sequence, and closing them appropriately—is critical to maintaining data integrity and avoiding this error. Additionally, developers should be cautious when performing commits within cursor loops, as this can disrupt the cursor’s state and lead to a fetch out of sequence condition.
In summary, the ORA-01002 error underscores the importance of meticulous cursor handling in Oracle database programming. By adhering to best practices in cursor management and understanding the implications of transaction control statements on cursor state,
Author Profile

-
Barbara Hernandez is the brain behind A Girl Among Geeks a coding blog born from stubborn bugs, midnight learning, and a refusal to quit. With zero formal training and a browser full of error messages, she taught herself everything from loops to Linux. Her mission? Make tech less intimidating, one real answer at a time.
Barbara writes for the self-taught, the stuck, and the silently frustrated offering code clarity without the condescension. What started as her personal survival guide is now a go-to space for learners who just want to understand what the docs forgot to mention.
Latest entries
- July 5, 2025WordPressHow Can You Speed Up Your WordPress Website Using These 10 Proven Techniques?
- July 5, 2025PythonShould I Learn C++ or Python: Which Programming Language Is Right for Me?
- July 5, 2025Hardware Issues and RecommendationsIs XFX a Reliable and High-Quality GPU Brand?
- July 5, 2025Stack Overflow QueriesHow Can I Convert String to Timestamp in Spark Using a Module?