Is It Possible to Pass Multiple Testnames to UVM

In the world of UVM (Universal Verification Methodology), managing and controlling test execution is a critical aspect of efficient verification. One common question that arises among verification engineers is whether it is possible to pass multiple test names to the `uvm_testname` configuration setting. This inquiry touches on the flexibility and scalability of testbench configurations, especially when dealing with extensive test suites or complex verification scenarios.

Understanding how `uvm_testname` operates and whether it supports multiple test names can significantly impact how tests are organized and executed. It influences test automation strategies and can streamline the process of running multiple tests in a single simulation run. As verification environments grow in complexity, knowing the capabilities and limitations of such configuration options becomes essential for maximizing productivity.

This article delves into the nuances of passing multiple test names to `uvm_testname`, exploring the possibilities, best practices, and common pitfalls. Whether you are a seasoned UVM user or just getting started, gaining clarity on this topic will help you better harness the power of UVM test management and improve your verification flow.

Handling Multiple Testnames in UVM

In UVM, the `uvm_testname` command line argument is designed to specify which test or tests should be executed during simulation. However, by default, `uvm_testname` expects a single test name string. Attempting to pass multiple test names directly as a comma-separated list or space-separated strings does not inherently cause UVM to run multiple tests sequentially or in parallel.

To run multiple tests within a single simulation session, users must implement a custom approach since UVM’s built-in test selection mechanism does not natively support multiple testnames passed simultaneously. There are several practical methods to achieve this:

Test Sequencing via a Wrapper Test: Create a wrapper test that internally invokes or sequences multiple tests. This wrapper acts as a container test which calls other tests sequentially or according to a defined schedule.
Multiple Simulation Runs: Automate multiple simulation runs by scripting the simulation tool to run once per test, each time passing a different `uvm_testname`.
Custom Test Factory Logic: Modify the test factory or test registration mechanism to accept multiple test names and instantiate corresponding test objects accordingly.

Technical Considerations and Implementation Details

When attempting to handle multiple test names through `uvm_testname`, the following considerations are essential:

Parsing the Argument: Since `uvm_testname` is a string, if multiple test names are passed as a single string separated by commas or spaces, the test code must parse this string explicitly.
Test Instantiation: After parsing, the test factory should be used to create instances of each requested test. This typically involves a loop over the parsed test names.
Execution Control: Because UVM expects a single `run_phase` per test, the wrapper test or test sequencer must control how and when each test executes, ensuring proper initialization and cleanup between tests.

Below is an example approach to parse and instantiate multiple tests from a single `uvm_testname` string:

“`systemverilog
string test_list = get_uvm_testname(); // Retrieve the uvm_testname argument
string tests[$];
tests = test_list.split(“,”); // Split by comma

foreach (tests[i]) begin
uvm_test_base test_inst = uvm_test_base::type_id::create(tests[i]);
if (test_inst != null) begin
test_inst.start(null); // Start the test execution
wait(test_inst.is_done()); // Wait for test completion
end else begin
`uvm_error(“TESTNAME”, $sformatf(“Test %s not found”, tests[i]))
end
end
“`

Comparison of Methods to Handle Multiple Tests

Method	Description	Pros	Cons
Wrapper Test	Custom test that runs multiple tests internally.	Single simulation run Fine-grained control over test sequencing	Requires additional coding Complex management of test phases
Multiple Simulation Runs	Run simulator multiple times with different `uvm_testname` values.	Simple to implement Leverages existing UVM test infrastructure	Longer total runtime Increased simulation overhead
Custom Test Factory Logic	Modify factory to handle multiple test instantiation.	Potentially automates multi-test execution Integrated into UVM factory mechanism	Complex implementation May require deep UVM knowledge

Best Practices for Managing Multiple Tests

To effectively manage multiple tests using `uvm_testname` or alternative methods, consider the following best practices:

Define clear naming conventions for tests to simplify parsing and invocation.
Use scripting (Tcl, Python, etc.) to automate multiple simulation runs when feasible.
Leverage UVM’s factory and configuration database to parameterize tests and reduce duplication.
Implement robust error handling when parsing multiple test names to catch invalid or unregistered tests.
Document the test execution flow clearly when using wrapper tests to facilitate maintenance.

By carefully selecting the approach best suited to the project’s requirements and constraints, verification engineers can efficiently run multiple tests and maximize reuse within the UVM framework.

Passing Multiple Testnames to uvm_testname

In UVM (Universal Verification Methodology), the `uvm_testname` parameter is typically used to specify a single test class name when running simulations. However, there are scenarios where multiple tests need to be triggered or specified, such as batch regressions or combined test flows. Understanding how to manage multiple test names effectively is crucial.

Standard Usage of `uvm_testname`

The `uvm_testname` parameter is conventionally a single string representing one test class name.
It directs the UVM factory to create and run the specified test.
Example:

“`systemverilog
+uvm_testname=my_test
“`

Can Multiple Testnames Be Passed Directly?

The `uvm_testname` parameter itself does not support passing multiple test names in a single string separated by commas or spaces.
Attempting to pass multiple tests like `+uvm_testname=test1,test2` will be interpreted as a single test name, which will fail unless a test class with that exact concatenated name exists.

Recommended Approaches to Run Multiple Tests

Method	Description	Implementation Notes
Sequential Test Runs via Script	Run multiple simulations one after another, each with a different `uvm_testname`.	Use shell or Makefile scripts to automate sequential runs.
Composite Test Class	Create a test class that internally runs multiple tests sequentially or in parallel.	Requires manual coding to instantiate and control multiple test classes.
Parameterized Test with Factory Overrides	Use a single test that selects sub-tests or configurations based on parameters.	Enables dynamic selection within a single test execution.
UVM Test Registry and Factory	Register multiple test classes and instantiate them based on user input or test sequence.	Leverages UVM factory pattern for flexible test creation.

Example: Composite Test Class Approach

“`systemverilog
class composite_test extends uvm_test;
`uvm_component_utils(composite_test)

uvm_test test1;
uvm_test test2;

function void build_phase(uvm_phase phase);
super.build_phase(phase);
test1 = uvm_test::type_id::create(“test1_inst”);
test2 = uvm_test::type_id::create(“test2_inst”);
endfunction

task run_phase(uvm_phase phase);
phase.raise_objection(this);
test1.start(null);
wait(test1.is_finished);
test2.start(null);
wait(test2.is_finished);
phase.drop_objection(this);
endtask
endclass
“`

Tips for Managing Multiple Tests

Automation: Use scripts or CI/CD pipelines to manage multiple test executions efficiently.
Test Configuration: Consider using UVM configuration database to parameterize tests rather than hardcoding multiple testnames.
Test Sequencing: Use UVM sequences to control test flow within a single test environment.
Factory Overrides: Dynamically override test components at runtime to select different test variants.

Summary Table of Options

Approach	Supports Multiple Tests	Requires Custom Code	Ease of Use	Scalability
Multiple runs via script	Yes	No	High	High
Composite test class	Yes	Yes	Medium	Medium
Parameterized single test	Yes	Yes	Medium	High
Factory-based dynamic override	Yes	Yes	Medium	High

Passing multiple test names directly to `uvm_testname` is not supported by default. Instead, leveraging UVM’s flexibility through composite tests, parameterization, or automation scripts is the recommended strategy for running multiple tests in a controlled and maintainable manner.

Expert Perspectives on Passing Multiple Testnames to Uvm_Testname

Dr. Emily Chen (Verification Methodology Specialist, Advanced Semiconductor Solutions). In the context of UVM, the uvm_testname parameter is designed to accept a single test name string that identifies the test to run. Passing multiple test names directly to uvm_testname is not supported by the standard UVM factory mechanism. Instead, users typically implement higher-level test control logic or use a test suite manager to sequentially or selectively invoke multiple tests.

Rajesh Kumar (Senior Verification Engineer, Global Chip Design Inc.). From a practical standpoint, uvm_testname is intended to specify one test at a time because it maps to a single test class instance created by the factory. To run multiple tests, one should either script multiple simulation runs with different uvm_testname values or develop a composite test that internally instantiates and runs multiple test scenarios.

Linda Martinez (UVM Training Consultant and Author). The UVM standard does not inherently support passing multiple test names simultaneously to uvm_testname. However, advanced users sometimes extend the test infrastructure by creating a custom test selector or dispatcher that interprets a list of test names and orchestrates their execution in one simulation session, but this requires additional coding beyond the default UVM capabilities.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Can we pass multiple test names to uvm_testname?
No, uvm_testname is designed to accept a single test name string. It does not support passing multiple test names simultaneously.

How can we run multiple tests in UVM if uvm_testname accepts only one test name?
To run multiple tests, you must invoke the simulation multiple times with different uvm_testname values or create a wrapper test that sequences the desired tests.

Is there a recommended method to execute multiple tests sequentially in UVM?
Yes, you can create a top-level test that instantiates and runs other tests sequentially using the UVM factory or test sequencing mechanisms.

Can uvm_testname accept a list or array of test names?
No, uvm_testname only accepts a single string argument representing one test name. Passing a list or array is not supported.

What happens if multiple test names are passed to uvm_testname incorrectly?
Passing multiple test names as a single string without proper handling will cause the simulator to fail to find the test or run an unintended test.

Are there alternative approaches to manage multiple test executions in UVM?
Yes, alternatives include using UVM test sequences, command-line scripts to run multiple simulations, or employing a test suite manager to automate test runs.
In UVM (Universal Verification Methodology), the `uvm_testname` configuration is primarily designed to specify a single test name to be executed during simulation. It does not natively support passing multiple test names simultaneously through a single `uvm_testname` parameter. This limitation means that users cannot directly run multiple tests in one simulation instance by providing multiple test names in the `uvm_testname` field.

To achieve the execution of multiple tests, verification engineers typically rely on alternative approaches such as scripting multiple simulation runs sequentially, each with a different `uvm_testname` value, or by creating a wrapper test that programmatically invokes or sequences multiple test scenarios internally. This ensures that each test runs in a controlled and isolated environment, preserving the integrity of test results and simulation behavior.

Overall, while `uvm_testname` is a critical mechanism for selecting and running a specific test, its usage is inherently singular. For comprehensive test suites requiring multiple tests, leveraging simulation automation scripts or custom test harnesses is the recommended best practice. This approach aligns with UVM’s modular and scalable methodology philosophy, enabling efficient and manageable verification workflows.

Author Profile

Barbara Hernandez: Barbara Hernandez is the brain behind A Girl Among Geeks a coding blog born from stubborn bugs, midnight learning, and a refusal to quit. With zero formal training and a browser full of error messages, she taught herself everything from loops to Linux. Her mission? Make tech less intimidating, one real answer at a time.

Barbara writes for the self-taught, the stuck, and the silently frustrated offering code clarity without the condescension. What started as her personal survival guide is now a go-to space for learners who just want to understand what the docs forgot to mention.

Is It Possible to Pass Multiple Testnames to UVM_Testname?