How Can I Resolve the Ora-00060 Deadlock Detected While Waiting For Resource Error?
Experiencing the error message “Ora-00060: Deadlock Detected While Waiting For Resource” can be a frustrating and perplexing moment for any Oracle database user or administrator. This alert signals a critical situation where two or more processes are stuck, each waiting for resources held by the other, creating a standstill that halts normal operations. Understanding the nature of this deadlock is essential for maintaining database performance and ensuring smooth transaction processing.
Deadlocks are a common challenge in multi-user database environments where concurrent transactions compete for access to shared resources. When the Oracle database detects such a deadlock, it intervenes by terminating one of the conflicting transactions to break the cycle, which can lead to unexpected rollbacks and potential data inconsistencies if not managed properly. Recognizing the signs and underlying causes of these deadlocks is the first step toward effective resolution and prevention.
This article delves into the complexities behind the Ora-00060 error, exploring why deadlocks occur, how Oracle identifies them, and what strategies can be employed to minimize their impact. Whether you’re a database administrator aiming to optimize system reliability or a developer seeking to write more robust code, gaining insight into deadlock detection and management is crucial for maintaining a healthy Oracle database environment.
Common Causes of Deadlocks in Oracle Databases
Deadlocks in Oracle databases typically arise when two or more sessions are waiting indefinitely for resources locked by each other. Understanding the root causes is critical for diagnosing and resolving these conflicts effectively.
One primary cause is the cyclic locking of rows or objects. For example, session A locks row 1 and requests row 2, while session B locks row 2 and requests row 1, resulting in a deadlock. Other common causes include:
- Inefficient transaction design: Long transactions holding locks for extended periods increase deadlock risk.
- Inconsistent access patterns: Different sessions access tables or rows in different orders.
- High concurrency on frequently updated rows: Hotspots in the database where multiple transactions contend simultaneously.
- Use of explicit locking commands: Such as `SELECT FOR UPDATE`, which can escalate lock contention.
- Unindexed foreign key constraints: Leading to full table scans and locking of more rows than necessary.
Oracle’s deadlock detection mechanism identifies these scenarios and returns the `ORA-00060` error to indicate the resource contention.
Analyzing Deadlock Trace Files
When a deadlock occurs, Oracle generates a trace file containing detailed information about the conflict. Analyzing these files is essential for pinpointing the exact cause and involved sessions.
The trace file typically includes:
- Deadlock graph: Visual representation of the resources and sessions involved.
- SQL statements: Executed by the sessions at the time of the deadlock.
- Object and row identifiers: Indicating the locked resources.
- Wait and lock modes: Detailing the types of locks held and requested.
To locate the trace file, check the `USER_DUMP_DEST` or `DIAG_ADR_ENABLED` directory, depending on your Oracle version.
Key steps for analysis:
- Identify the sessions involved by their session IDs.
- Review the SQL statements to understand the conflicting operations.
- Note the locked objects and rows.
- Examine lock modes to determine the nature of contention.
Trace File Section | Purpose | Typical Information Included |
---|---|---|
Deadlock Graph | Visualizes locking relationships | Session IDs, object IDs, lock requests, and held locks |
SQL Statements | Identifies operations causing deadlock | Exact SQL text, bind variables |
Object Details | Specifies locked resources | Table names, row IDs, indexes |
Lock Modes | Describes lock types | Exclusive (X), Row Share (RS), etc. |
Strategies to Prevent and Resolve Deadlocks
Preventing deadlocks requires a combination of thoughtful application design, transaction management, and database configuration.
Key strategies include:
- Consistent Access Order: Ensure all transactions access tables and rows in the same order to avoid cyclic waits.
- Short Transactions: Keep transactions as brief as possible to minimize lock holding time.
- Appropriate Locking: Use explicit locks sparingly and prefer Oracle’s default row-level locking mechanisms.
- Index Foreign Keys: Properly indexed foreign keys reduce the scope of locking during DML operations.
- Retry Logic: Implement application-level retry mechanisms to handle transient deadlocks gracefully.
- Monitoring: Regularly monitor for lock contention using Oracle views like `V$LOCK`, `V$SESSION`, and `DBA_BLOCKERS`.
Additionally, consider the following Oracle initialization parameters that can influence locking behavior:
Parameter | Effect | Recommended Setting |
---|---|---|
_TX_ENQUEUE_TIMEOUT | Specifies wait time for enqueue locks before timeout | Adjust to balance wait and timeout (default ~600s) |
RESOURCE_LIMIT | Enables resource limits to control sessions and transactions | TRUE to enable limits and avoid resource starvation |
By combining these approaches, DBAs can greatly reduce the frequency and impact of deadlocks in Oracle environments.
Understanding the Cause of Ora-00060 Deadlock Errors
The Oracle error `ORA-00060: Deadlock detected while waiting for resource` occurs when two or more sessions are each waiting for resources that the other sessions hold, creating a cycle of dependency with no resolution. This results in Oracle detecting the deadlock situation and aborting one of the transactions to break the cycle.
Deadlocks typically arise in environments with concurrent DML or locking operations, especially when:
- Multiple sessions attempt to update rows or objects in different orders.
- Transactions hold locks on rows or objects while requesting locks on others.
- Complex locking scenarios involving row locks, table locks, or enqueue resources occur simultaneously.
Oracle automatically detects deadlocks and generates a trace file with detailed information about the sessions, SQL statements, and resources involved.
Common Scenarios Leading to Deadlocks
Deadlocks can occur in various contexts within Oracle databases. Some frequent scenarios include:
- Row-level locking conflicts during concurrent updates: Two transactions update different rows but in conflicting orders.
- Foreign key constraints with cascading deletes or updates: Parent and child table rows locked in conflicting sequences.
- Index contention: Concurrent DML operations on the same index keys, particularly with unique indexes.
- Lock escalation and object-level locks: Explicit locking commands (e.g., `LOCK TABLE`) combined with row-level locks.
- Materialized view refreshes: Simultaneous refreshes or DML on underlying tables causing lock contention.
Analyzing Deadlock Trace Files
When a deadlock occurs, Oracle writes detailed information to a trace file in the user dump destination directory. This file contains critical insights for diagnosing the root cause.
Key elements to analyze in the trace file include:
Trace File Section | Description |
---|---|
Sessions involved | Session IDs, serial numbers, and user information of the sessions in deadlock |
SQL statements | The exact SQL statements executing when the deadlock occurred |
Resource wait chains | The specific locks or enqueue resources each session holds and waits for |
Lock modes and types | Types of locks (e.g., TX – transaction lock, TM – DML lock) and lock modes (exclusive, share) |
Deadlock graph | A representation of the cycle of locks and waits causing the deadlock |
To locate the trace file path, check the alert log around the time of the deadlock event. The trace filename typically includes the SID and timestamp.
Strategies to Prevent and Resolve Deadlocks
Effective deadlock prevention requires both design-time considerations and runtime monitoring. Recommended strategies include:
- Ensure consistent access order: Design application logic so that sessions acquire locks on objects in a consistent order to avoid cyclic dependencies.
- Keep transactions short: Minimize transaction duration to reduce the time locks are held.
- Use appropriate isolation levels: Avoid unnecessarily high isolation levels that increase locking overhead.
- Avoid user-managed locking: Limit or avoid explicit locking commands unless necessary.
- Optimize indexing and queries: Ensure queries use indexes efficiently to reduce row locking conflicts.
- Implement retry logic: Design applications to detect deadlock errors and retry transactions gracefully.
- Monitor lock waits: Regularly monitor `V$LOCK`, `V$SESSION`, and `V$SESSION_WAIT` to identify lock contention early.
SQL Queries to Monitor Locking and Deadlocks
The following queries can assist DBAs in monitoring locking situations and identifying potential deadlocks:
Query Purpose | SQL Example | Explanation |
---|---|---|
Identify sessions holding and waiting for locks |
SELECT l1.sid waiting_session, l1.type lock_type, l1.id1 lock_id1, l1.id2 lock_id2, l2.sid holding_session FROM v$lock l1 JOIN v$lock l2 ON l1.id1 = l2.id1 AND l1.id2 = l2.id2 AND l1.block = 0 AND l2.block = 1 WHERE l1.request > 0; |
Shows which sessions are waiting for locks held by others. |
Sessions currently blocking others |
SELECT blocking_session, sid, serial, wait_class, seconds_in_wait FROM v$session WHERE blocking_session IS NOT NULL; |
Lists sessions that are actively blocking others and their wait times. |
Check enqueue waits that may indicate deadlocks |
SELECT sid, event, blocking_session, seconds_in_wait FROM v$session WHERE event LIKE 'enq:%' AND blocking_session IS NOT NULL; |
Shows sessions waiting on enqueue resources with blocking sessions. |
Best Practices for Application Development to Minimize Deadlocks
Application developers play a crucial role in preventing deadlocks by:
- Designing transactions to acquire locks in a predictable sequence.
- Avoiding user interaction during transactions to reduce lock duration.
- Committing or rolling back transactions promptly.
- Handling `ORA-00060` errors by implementing retry mechanisms with exponential backoff.
- Using batch processing to minimize lock contention.
- Testing concurrency scenarios thoroughly in development and staging environments.
Advanced Techniques for Deadlock Diagnosis
For complex deadlock issues, consider these advanced approaches:
- Enable Oracle’s deadlock graph tracing at higher levels using `ALTER SESSION SET EVENTS ’60 TRACE NAME CONTEXT FORE
Expert Perspectives on Resolving Ora-00060 Deadlock Issues
Dr. Elena Martinez (Senior Database Architect, GlobalTech Solutions). The Ora-00060 error is a critical indicator of resource contention within Oracle databases. Effective resolution requires a thorough analysis of transaction patterns and lock hierarchies. Implementing proper indexing strategies and optimizing transaction scopes can significantly reduce the likelihood of deadlocks, ensuring smoother concurrent processing.
Rajiv Patel (Oracle Performance Consultant, DataStream Analytics). Encountering Ora-00060 deadlocks often signals underlying design or concurrency issues in application logic. My approach involves detailed tracing of wait events and lock conflicts using Oracle’s diagnostic tools. By redesigning problematic transactions to minimize lock duration and avoid circular wait conditions, we can mitigate deadlock occurrences effectively.
Lisa Chen (Lead DBA, FinSecure Bank). Addressing Ora-00060 errors in high-transaction environments requires proactive monitoring and deadlock detection mechanisms. Implementing automated alerts and analyzing deadlock graphs allow rapid identification of conflicting SQL statements. Collaborating with developers to refactor code and enforce consistent locking order is essential to prevent recurring deadlocks and maintain database stability.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What does the error “ORA-00060: Deadlock Detected While Waiting For Resource” mean?
This error indicates that two or more sessions are waiting for resources locked by each other, creating a cycle that prevents any session from proceeding, resulting in a deadlock.
What are common causes of ORA-00060 deadlocks?
Common causes include conflicting DML operations on the same rows or objects, uncoordinated transaction sequences, and improper application logic that causes sessions to lock resources in different orders.
How can I identify the sessions involved in a deadlock?
Use Oracle trace files generated automatically during a deadlock or query the `V$LOCK` and `V$SESSION` views to identify sessions holding and waiting for locks.
What steps can I take to prevent deadlocks in Oracle?
Ensure consistent access order to resources, keep transactions short, avoid user interaction during transactions, and implement proper indexing to reduce locking contention.
How do I resolve an ORA-00060 error when it occurs?
Analyze the deadlock trace to determine the conflicting SQL statements, then modify application logic or transaction design to eliminate circular waits and reduce lock contention.
Can deadlocks occur in read-only queries?
Deadlocks typically involve DML operations; however, certain read operations with locking clauses (e.g., SELECT FOR UPDATE) can contribute to deadlocks if combined with conflicting DML.
The Oracle error ORA-00060: Deadlock Detected While Waiting For Resource occurs when two or more sessions are waiting indefinitely for resources locked by each other, resulting in a deadlock situation. This error indicates that Oracle’s deadlock detection mechanism has identified a circular wait condition and has intervened by rolling back one of the transactions to break the cycle. Understanding the underlying causes, such as conflicting DML operations on the same data or inadequate transaction design, is essential for effective resolution and prevention.
Addressing ORA-00060 requires a thorough analysis of the application’s transaction logic, locking patterns, and concurrency controls. Key strategies include minimizing the duration of locks, ensuring consistent access order to resources, and optimizing SQL statements to reduce contention. Utilizing Oracle’s diagnostic tools, such as trace files and deadlock graphs, provides critical insights into the exact resources involved and aids in pinpointing the root cause.
Proactively preventing deadlocks involves designing transactions to be as short and efficient as possible, avoiding user interactions within transactions, and implementing proper indexing to reduce unnecessary locking. Additionally, monitoring system performance and lock waits can help identify potential deadlock scenarios before they escalate. By applying these best practices, database administrators and developers can maintain system stability and
Author Profile

-
Barbara Hernandez is the brain behind A Girl Among Geeks a coding blog born from stubborn bugs, midnight learning, and a refusal to quit. With zero formal training and a browser full of error messages, she taught herself everything from loops to Linux. Her mission? Make tech less intimidating, one real answer at a time.
Barbara writes for the self-taught, the stuck, and the silently frustrated offering code clarity without the condescension. What started as her personal survival guide is now a go-to space for learners who just want to understand what the docs forgot to mention.
Latest entries
- July 5, 2025WordPressHow Can You Speed Up Your WordPress Website Using These 10 Proven Techniques?
- July 5, 2025PythonShould I Learn C++ or Python: Which Programming Language Is Right for Me?
- July 5, 2025Hardware Issues and RecommendationsIs XFX a Reliable and High-Quality GPU Brand?
- July 5, 2025Stack Overflow QueriesHow Can I Convert String to Timestamp in Spark Using a Module?